Jennifer Flom

Jennifer FlomJennifer FlomJennifer Flom

Jennifer Flom

Jennifer FlomJennifer FlomJennifer Flom
  • Home
  • UX Toolkit
  • Portfolio
  • Resume
  • More
    • Home
    • UX Toolkit
    • Portfolio
    • Resume

  • Home
  • UX Toolkit
  • Portfolio
  • Resume

Project 2: Mobile App Concept Research

Project Highlights

ROLE: UX researcher 

Led planning, moderated, assisted with analysis, assisted with reporting, created wireframe mockups, presented to executives


METHODS: Evaluative research, mixed-method, interviews, iterative usability testing, survey, mobile app concept / prototype research, lab-based / remote moderation, in-home / remote accessibility research 


OUTCOMES: Improved usability, enhanced experience


TOOLS: Microsoft Office, usability lab (in-person sessions), video equipment (in-home sessions), Discuss.io & Zoom (remote sessions)


SKILLS: Logistics, strategy, research, data analysis, client management, empathetic moderating, wireframing, executive presentation

Overview

CLIENT: A health insurance provider  


PROBLEM: The client wanted to understand the mobile usability experience of their medical provider locator tool and to identify future product needs. They conducted studies once a year for six years as the experience evolved from a website to a mobile-responsive website to an app.


TEAM: Our consulting team consisted of a project / recruiting manager, UX strategist, and UX Researcher (me). The stakeholder team consisted of a research manager, VOC manager, UX designer, content strategist, product owners, and executive leadership.


DELIVERABLES: Overview report of findings, recommendations, comparative examples, and mockups

Strategy

To best understand the participants' experience during each session, I decided to use a mixed-methods approach:

  • Qualitative interview: At the start of each session, I would interview the participant to understand how they typically use their insurance tools and what they need out of those tools.
  • Usability testing: During the sessions, I followed a more traditional usability study format to observe their behaviors going through the site / app / prototype and to probe their experience.
  • Quantitative survey: At the end of the session, I asked each participant to fill out a short questionnaire with rating questions and feedback so we could assess their overall sentiments about the site experience. Due to the number of participants (around 30 per study), the results from the survey were reported as directional feedback in a visual format.
  • Contextual inquiry / Accessibility research: As part of the research, I would also go into people's homes to gather feedback on how well the site worked with the accessibility tools such as JAWS, ZoomText, mouth sticks, SmartNav head mouse, etc.
  • Remote research: During Covid, the studies all took place in remote settings.

Timeline

Outcomes

Improved Usability

Enhanced Experience

Enhanced Experience

Over the 6 rounds of research, I provided insight and recommendations that helped the team take it from a difficult website to a full-featured, intuitive mobile app.

Enhanced Experience

Enhanced Experience

Enhanced Experience

The original experience was basic and unappreciated and the final version was engaging, met user needs, and included cost estimates for common procedures

Reflection

  • When working with a large team comprised of people from different departments, recommend they meet ahead of the kick-off meeting and provide guidance for how they can come to a consensus on goals before the project starts.
  • Medicare and Medicaid audiences and those with disabilities requires a different style of moderating and session management than the more typical user.

Copyright © 2023 Jennifer Flom - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by GoDaddy Website Builder

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept